La prueba ilícita. Una cuestión de concepto
Illicit proof is an institution that has been being treated since the late 19th century. The terminology used for its study is varied, but the features of it are common despite the part of the world in which it is developing. It is generally defined as evidence resulting from the infringement of leg...
| Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Status: | Published version |
| Publication date: | 2021 |
| Country: | Perú |
| Institution: | PUCP |
| Repository: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Language: | Spanish |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24743 |
| Online Access: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/24743 |
| Access Level: | Open access |
| Keyword: | Proof Rules Process Illicit Rule of law Prueba Regla jurídica Proceso Ilicitud Estado de Derecho |
| _version_ | 1878412848237903872 |
|---|---|
| author | Calderón Arias, Emma |
| author_browse | Calderón Arias, Emma |
| author_facet | Calderón Arias, Emma |
| author_role | author |
| collection | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| description | Illicit proof is an institution that has been being treated since the late 19th century. The terminology used for its study is varied, but the features of it are common despite the part of the world in which it is developing. It is generally defined as evidence resulting from the infringement of legal rules or, within them, fundamental rights. However, I start from the position that unlawful illicit proof is result of the violation of legal norms in general. What happens is that it usually treated linearly without delving into specific issues of its own concept. This responds to a kind of inertia shown in the doctrine when talking about the concept of it. The need for conceptual clarification of the illicit test noted, including guidelines that from legal theory and jurisprudence can help enrich such studies. |
| eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
| format | article |
| id | PE_dcdc4cd701fd6d3f62d6bcdfdbefa9f3 |
| institution | PUCP |
| instname_str | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| language | spa |
| network_acronym_str | PE |
| network_name_str | Perú |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24743 |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publishDateSort | 2021 |
| publisher | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| publisherStr | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| reponame_str | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| spelling | La prueba ilícita. Una cuestión de concepto Illicit proof. A matter of concept Calderón Arias, Emma Proof Rules Process Illicit Rule of law Prueba Regla jurídica Proceso Ilicitud Estado de Derecho Illicit proof is an institution that has been being treated since the late 19th century. The terminology used for its study is varied, but the features of it are common despite the part of the world in which it is developing. It is generally defined as evidence resulting from the infringement of legal rules or, within them, fundamental rights. However, I start from the position that unlawful illicit proof is result of the violation of legal norms in general. What happens is that it usually treated linearly without delving into specific issues of its own concept. This responds to a kind of inertia shown in the doctrine when talking about the concept of it. The need for conceptual clarification of the illicit test noted, including guidelines that from legal theory and jurisprudence can help enrich such studies. La prueba ilícita es una institución que se viene tratando desde finales del siglo XIX. La terminología utilizada para su estudio es variada, pero los rasgos de esta institución son comunes a pesar del ordenamiento jurídico en el que se esté aplicando. Por lo general, se define como prueba que resulta de la vulneración de normas jurídicas o, dentro de estas, derechos fundamentales. Sin embargo, en el presente artículo, parto de la posición que entiende la prueba ilícita como resultado de la vulneración de normas del ordenamiento en general. Lo que sucede es que suele abordarse de manera lineal, faltando aun por profundizar en cuestiones específicas de su propio concepto. Ello responde a una especie de inercia y a estudios conjuntos que se muestran en la doctrina cuando se habla sobre la materia. De modo que, se observa la necesidad de realizar una labor de análisis conceptual de la prueba ilícita, incluyendo pautas que desde lo teórico y jurisprudencial que pueden ayudar a enriquecer dichos estudios. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/24743 |
| spellingShingle | La prueba ilícita. Una cuestión de concepto Calderón Arias, Emma Proof Rules Process Illicit Rule of law Prueba Regla jurídica Proceso Ilicitud Estado de Derecho |
| status_str | publishedVersion |
| title | La prueba ilícita. Una cuestión de concepto |
| title_full | La prueba ilícita. Una cuestión de concepto |
| title_fullStr | La prueba ilícita. Una cuestión de concepto |
| title_full_unstemmed | La prueba ilícita. Una cuestión de concepto |
| title_short | La prueba ilícita. Una cuestión de concepto |
| title_sort | La prueba ilícita. Una cuestión de concepto |
| topic | Proof Rules Process Illicit Rule of law Prueba Regla jurídica Proceso Ilicitud Estado de Derecho |
| topic_facet | Proof Rules Process Illicit Rule of law Prueba Regla jurídica Proceso Ilicitud Estado de Derecho |
| url | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/24743 |