Interaction between motion scales: When performance in motion discrimination is worse for a compound stimulus than for its integrating components

Motion direction discrimination becomes impaired when combinations of drifting high spatial frequency (HSF) and static low spatial frequency (LSF) patterns are merged into a compound stimulus. Such impairment has been suggested to occur due to an interaction between motion sensors tuned to coarse an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Authors: Luna del Valle, Raúl; Serrano Pedraza, Ignacio
Format: Article
Publication date:2020
Country:España
Institution:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
Repository:Docta Complutense
Language:English
OAI Identifier:oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/110959
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/110959
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:159.93
Motion perception
Contrast
Spatial frequency
Interaction between fine and coarse scales
Motion sensors
Inhibition
Percepción
6106.09 Procesos de Percepción
_version_ 1878739186202181633
author Luna del Valle, Raúl
author2 Serrano Pedraza, Ignacio
author2_role author
author_browse Luna del Valle, Raúl
Serrano Pedraza, Ignacio
author_facet Luna del Valle, Raúl
Serrano Pedraza, Ignacio
author_role author
collection Docta Complutense
description Motion direction discrimination becomes impaired when combinations of drifting high spatial frequency (HSF) and static low spatial frequency (LSF) patterns are merged into a compound stimulus. Such impairment has been suggested to occur due to an interaction between motion sensors tuned to coarse and fine scale spatial patterns. This interaction is modulated by different stimulus parameters like temporal frequency, size, the spectral components mixed, and their relative contrast. The present research precisely aims to explore in a deeper way the interaction’s dependency upon the spatial frequency and the relative contrast of the components when both move coherently. Two experiments were therefore performed measuring duration thresholds (Experiment 1) and proportion of correct responses (Experiment 2) in a motion direction discrimination task. Stimuli were vertical Gabor patches of 4 deg diameter horizontally drifting with a speed of 2 deg/sec. Simple LSF and HSF stimuli as well as complex stimuli where both components moved coherently (LSFm + HSFm) were used. These were grouped in the following LSF and HSF pairs: 0.25–0.75, 0.5–1.5, 1–3 and 2–6 c/deg. Each component had a Michelson contrast of 28% or 7%, giving rise to different relative contrast combinations. Most interestingly, the results show a decrease in performance for complex stimuli with respect to each of their simple components when the LSF component has a lower contrast than the HSF one. The decrease depends on the particular spatial frequencies mixed in a stimulus. Further knowledge about the inhibitory mechanism is thus provided, revealing its joint dependency upon contrast and spatial frequency.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id ES_bcadc27f8a2e71f04d58dc8f969cf45f
institution Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
instname_str Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
language eng
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
oai_identifier_str oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/110959
publishDate 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher Elsevier
publisherStr Elsevier
reponame_str Docta Complutense
spelling Interaction between motion scales: When performance in motion discrimination is worse for a compound stimulus than for its integrating components Luna del Valle, Raúl Serrano Pedraza, Ignacio 159.93 Motion perception Contrast Spatial frequency Interaction between fine and coarse scales Motion sensors Inhibition Percepción 6106.09 Procesos de Percepción Motion direction discrimination becomes impaired when combinations of drifting high spatial frequency (HSF) and static low spatial frequency (LSF) patterns are merged into a compound stimulus. Such impairment has been suggested to occur due to an interaction between motion sensors tuned to coarse and fine scale spatial patterns. This interaction is modulated by different stimulus parameters like temporal frequency, size, the spectral components mixed, and their relative contrast. The present research precisely aims to explore in a deeper way the interaction’s dependency upon the spatial frequency and the relative contrast of the components when both move coherently. Two experiments were therefore performed measuring duration thresholds (Experiment 1) and proportion of correct responses (Experiment 2) in a motion direction discrimination task. Stimuli were vertical Gabor patches of 4 deg diameter horizontally drifting with a speed of 2 deg/sec. Simple LSF and HSF stimuli as well as complex stimuli where both components moved coherently (LSFm + HSFm) were used. These were grouped in the following LSF and HSF pairs: 0.25–0.75, 0.5–1.5, 1–3 and 2–6 c/deg. Each component had a Michelson contrast of 28% or 7%, giving rise to different relative contrast combinations. Most interestingly, the results show a decrease in performance for complex stimuli with respect to each of their simple components when the LSF component has a lower contrast than the HSF one. The decrease depends on the particular spatial frequencies mixed in a stimulus. Further knowledge about the inhibitory mechanism is thus provided, revealing its joint dependency upon contrast and spatial frequency. Elsevier https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/110959
spellingShingle Interaction between motion scales: When performance in motion discrimination is worse for a compound stimulus than for its integrating components
Luna del Valle, Raúl
159.93
Motion perception
Contrast
Spatial frequency
Interaction between fine and coarse scales
Motion sensors
Inhibition
Percepción
6106.09 Procesos de Percepción
title Interaction between motion scales: When performance in motion discrimination is worse for a compound stimulus than for its integrating components
title_full Interaction between motion scales: When performance in motion discrimination is worse for a compound stimulus than for its integrating components
title_fullStr Interaction between motion scales: When performance in motion discrimination is worse for a compound stimulus than for its integrating components
title_full_unstemmed Interaction between motion scales: When performance in motion discrimination is worse for a compound stimulus than for its integrating components
title_short Interaction between motion scales: When performance in motion discrimination is worse for a compound stimulus than for its integrating components
title_sort Interaction between motion scales: When performance in motion discrimination is worse for a compound stimulus than for its integrating components
topic 159.93
Motion perception
Contrast
Spatial frequency
Interaction between fine and coarse scales
Motion sensors
Inhibition
Percepción
6106.09 Procesos de Percepción
topic_facet 159.93
Motion perception
Contrast
Spatial frequency
Interaction between fine and coarse scales
Motion sensors
Inhibition
Percepción
6106.09 Procesos de Percepción
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/110959