Doing a Systematic Review in Health Sciences

This paper aims to provide a practical, summarized, and clear guide of steps to carry out a systematic review and is aimed at researchers in the field of Health Sciences. The review process runs from the initial questioning to the final report, providing useful information on tools available at each...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Authors: Cajal, Berta; Jiménez, Rafael; Gervilla Garcia, Elena; Montaño, Juan José
Format: Article
Publication date:2020
Country:España
Institution:Conselleria de Salut i Consum del Govern de les Illes Balears
Repository:Docusalut
Language:English
OAI Identifier:oai:docusalut.com:20.500.13003/9315
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/9315
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Systematic review
Research
Evidence
Guide
Meta-analysis
Health sciences
Description
Summary:This paper aims to provide a practical, summarized, and clear guide of steps to carry out a systematic review and is aimed at researchers in the field of Health Sciences. The review process runs from the initial questioning to the final report, providing useful information on tools available at each stage. Systematic review and meta-analysis are currently the evidence synthesis tools of the highest level of scientific quality. They are in themselves a secondary research methodology, whose objective is to locate, evaluate, and synthesize the best evidence by selecting original papers or quality primary publications. The procedure to achieve the objective is presented as a sequential and systematized process, in stages, following the transparency principle, so as to ensure its replicability.