The gender gap in higher STEM studies: A systematic literature review

[EN] The development of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) requires more qualified professionals in these fields. However, gender segregation in higher education in this sector is creating a gender gap that means that for some disciplines female representation does not even rea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Authors: Verdugo-Castro, Sonia; García-Holgado, Alicia; Sánchez-Gómez, María Cruz
Format: Article
Status:Published version
Publication date:2022
Country:España
Institution:Universidad de Salamanca (USAL)
Repository:GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamanca
OAI Identifier:oai:gredos.usal.es:10366/162249
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10366/162249
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2022.E10300
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Gender gap
STEM
Gender
Stereotypes
Diversity
Higher education
5312.04 Educación
_version_ 1878737469274324992
author Verdugo-Castro, Sonia
author2 García-Holgado, Alicia
Sánchez-Gómez, María Cruz
author2_role author
author
author_browse García-Holgado, Alicia
Sánchez-Gómez, María Cruz
Verdugo-Castro, Sonia
author_facet Verdugo-Castro, Sonia
García-Holgado, Alicia
Sánchez-Gómez, María Cruz
author_role author
collection GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamanca
description [EN] The development of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) requires more qualified professionals in these fields. However, gender segregation in higher education in this sector is creating a gender gap that means that for some disciplines female representation does not even reach 30% of the total. In order to propose measures to address the phenomenon, it is necessary to understand the possible causes of this issue. A systematic literature review and mapping were carried out for the study, following the PRISMA guidelines and flowchart. The research questions to be answered were (RQ1) What studies exist on the gender gap in relation to the choice of higher education in the STEM field; and (RQ2) How do gender roles and stereotypes influence decision-making related to higher education? The review of peer-reviewed scientific articles, conferences texts, books and book chapters on the European education area was applied. A total of 4571 initial results were obtained and, after the process marked by the PRISMA flowchart, the final results were reduced to 26. The results revealed that gender stereotypes are strong drivers of the gender gap in general, and the Leaky Pipeline and Stereotype Threat in particular. To narrow the gender gap, it is necessary to focus on influences from the family, the educational environment, and the peer group, as well as from the culture itself. Positive self-concept, self-efficacy, self-confidence, and self-perception need to be fostered, so that the individual chooses their studies according to their goals.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id ES_a049ce57fa4be22eff7b2ccd5e09c38f
institution Universidad de Salamanca (USAL)
instname_str Universidad de Salamanca (USAL)
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
oai_identifier_str oai:gredos.usal.es:10366/162249
publishDate 2022
publishDateSort 2022
publisher CellPress
publisherStr CellPress
reponame_str GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamanca
spelling The gender gap in higher STEM studies: A systematic literature review Verdugo-Castro, Sonia García-Holgado, Alicia Sánchez-Gómez, María Cruz Gender gap STEM Gender Stereotypes Diversity Higher education 5312.04 Educación [EN] The development of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) requires more qualified professionals in these fields. However, gender segregation in higher education in this sector is creating a gender gap that means that for some disciplines female representation does not even reach 30% of the total. In order to propose measures to address the phenomenon, it is necessary to understand the possible causes of this issue. A systematic literature review and mapping were carried out for the study, following the PRISMA guidelines and flowchart. The research questions to be answered were (RQ1) What studies exist on the gender gap in relation to the choice of higher education in the STEM field; and (RQ2) How do gender roles and stereotypes influence decision-making related to higher education? The review of peer-reviewed scientific articles, conferences texts, books and book chapters on the European education area was applied. A total of 4571 initial results were obtained and, after the process marked by the PRISMA flowchart, the final results were reduced to 26. The results revealed that gender stereotypes are strong drivers of the gender gap in general, and the Leaky Pipeline and Stereotype Threat in particular. To narrow the gender gap, it is necessary to focus on influences from the family, the educational environment, and the peer group, as well as from the culture itself. Positive self-concept, self-efficacy, self-confidence, and self-perception need to be fostered, so that the individual chooses their studies according to their goals. CellPress http://hdl.handle.net/10366/162249 https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2022.E10300
spellingShingle The gender gap in higher STEM studies: A systematic literature review
Verdugo-Castro, Sonia
Gender gap
STEM
Gender
Stereotypes
Diversity
Higher education
5312.04 Educación
status_str publishedVersion
title The gender gap in higher STEM studies: A systematic literature review
title_full The gender gap in higher STEM studies: A systematic literature review
title_fullStr The gender gap in higher STEM studies: A systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed The gender gap in higher STEM studies: A systematic literature review
title_short The gender gap in higher STEM studies: A systematic literature review
title_sort The gender gap in higher STEM studies: A systematic literature review
topic Gender gap
STEM
Gender
Stereotypes
Diversity
Higher education
5312.04 Educación
topic_facet Gender gap
STEM
Gender
Stereotypes
Diversity
Higher education
5312.04 Educación
url http://hdl.handle.net/10366/162249
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2022.E10300