Pretense, cancellation, and the act theory of propositions

Several philosophers advance substantive theories of propositions, to deal with several issues they raise in connection with a concern with a long pedigree in philosophy, the problem of the unity of propositions. The qualification ‘substantive’ is meant to contrast with ‘minimal’ or ‘deflationary’ –...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Author: García-Carpintero, Manuel
Format: Article
Status:Accepted version
Publication date:2021
Country:España
Institution:Universidad de Barcelona
Repository:Dipòsit Digital de la UB
OAI Identifier:oai:diposit.ub.edu:2445/208370
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/2445/208370
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Representació (Filosofia)
Proposició (Lògica)
Representation (Philosophy)
Proposition (Logic)
_version_ 1878736594603606016
author García-Carpintero, Manuel
author_browse García-Carpintero, Manuel
author_facet García-Carpintero, Manuel
author_role author
collection Dipòsit Digital de la UB
description Several philosophers advance substantive theories of propositions, to deal with several issues they raise in connection with a concern with a long pedigree in philosophy, the problem of the unity of propositions. The qualification ‘substantive’ is meant to contrast with ‘minimal’ or ‘deflationary’ – roughly, views that reject that propositions have a hidden nature, worth investigating. Substantive views appear to create spurious problems by characterizing propositions in ways that make them unfit to perform their theoretical jobs. I will present in this light some critical points against Hanks’ (2015, 2019) act-theoretic view, and Recanati’s (2019) recent elaboration of Hanks’ notion of cancellation. Both Hanks and Recanati, I’ll argue, rely on problematic conceptions of fiction and pretense.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id ES_91c62dfcb04e4e15a70905ce3283facc
institution Universidad de Barcelona
instname_str Universidad de Barcelona
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
oai_identifier_str oai:diposit.ub.edu:2445/208370
publishDate 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher Oslo University Press
publisherStr Oslo University Press
reponame_str Dipòsit Digital de la UB
spelling Pretense, cancellation, and the act theory of propositions García-Carpintero, Manuel Representació (Filosofia) Proposició (Lògica) Representation (Philosophy) Proposition (Logic) Several philosophers advance substantive theories of propositions, to deal with several issues they raise in connection with a concern with a long pedigree in philosophy, the problem of the unity of propositions. The qualification ‘substantive’ is meant to contrast with ‘minimal’ or ‘deflationary’ – roughly, views that reject that propositions have a hidden nature, worth investigating. Substantive views appear to create spurious problems by characterizing propositions in ways that make them unfit to perform their theoretical jobs. I will present in this light some critical points against Hanks’ (2015, 2019) act-theoretic view, and Recanati’s (2019) recent elaboration of Hanks’ notion of cancellation. Both Hanks and Recanati, I’ll argue, rely on problematic conceptions of fiction and pretense. Oslo University Press https://hdl.handle.net/2445/208370
spellingShingle Pretense, cancellation, and the act theory of propositions
García-Carpintero, Manuel
Representació (Filosofia)
Proposició (Lògica)
Representation (Philosophy)
Proposition (Logic)
status_str acceptedVersion
title Pretense, cancellation, and the act theory of propositions
title_full Pretense, cancellation, and the act theory of propositions
title_fullStr Pretense, cancellation, and the act theory of propositions
title_full_unstemmed Pretense, cancellation, and the act theory of propositions
title_short Pretense, cancellation, and the act theory of propositions
title_sort Pretense, cancellation, and the act theory of propositions
topic Representació (Filosofia)
Proposició (Lògica)
Representation (Philosophy)
Proposition (Logic)
topic_facet Representació (Filosofia)
Proposició (Lògica)
Representation (Philosophy)
Proposition (Logic)
url https://hdl.handle.net/2445/208370