COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures
Purpose: Systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) differ from reviews of interventions and diagnostic test accuracy studies and are complex. In fact, conducting a review of one or more PROMs comprises of multiple reviews (i.e., one review for each measurement property of each...
| Autores: | ; ; ; ; ; ; |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Artículo |
| Estado: | Published version |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2018 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| Repositorio: | Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:recercat.cat:10230/35763 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10230/35763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3 |
| Nivel de acceso: | Acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | COSMIN Systematic review Measurement properties PROM Outcome measurement instrument Outcome measures Methodology |
| _version_ | 1878735440159178752 |
|---|---|
| author | Prinsen, Cecilia A.C. |
| author2 | Mokkink, Lidwine B. Bouter, Lex M. Alonso Caballero, Jordi Patrick, Donald L. De Vet, Henrica C. W. Terwee, Caroline B. |
| author2_role | author author author author author author |
| author_browse | Alonso Caballero, Jordi Bouter, Lex M. De Vet, Henrica C. W. Mokkink, Lidwine B. Patrick, Donald L. Prinsen, Cecilia A.C. Terwee, Caroline B. |
| author_facet | Prinsen, Cecilia A.C. Mokkink, Lidwine B. Bouter, Lex M. Alonso Caballero, Jordi Patrick, Donald L. De Vet, Henrica C. W. Terwee, Caroline B. |
| author_role | author |
| collection | Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| description | Purpose: Systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) differ from reviews of interventions and diagnostic test accuracy studies and are complex. In fact, conducting a review of one or more PROMs comprises of multiple reviews (i.e., one review for each measurement property of each PROM). In the absence of guidance specifically designed for reviews on measurement properties, our aim was to develop a guideline for conducting systematic reviews of PROMs. Methods: Based on literature reviews and expert opinions, and in concordance with existing guidelines, the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) steering committee developed a guideline for systematic reviews of PROMs. Results: A consecutive ten-step procedure for conducting a systematic review of PROMs is proposed. Steps 1–4 concern preparing and performing the literature search, and selecting relevant studies. Steps 5–8 concern the evaluation of the quality of the eligible studies, the measurement properties, and the interpretability and feasibility aspects. Steps 9 and 10 concern formulating recommendations and reporting the systematic review. Conclusions: The COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of PROMs includes methodology to combine the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties with the quality of the PROM itself (i.e., its measurement properties). This enables reviewers to draw transparent conclusions and making evidence-based recommendations on the quality of PROMs, and supports the evidence-based selection of PROMs for use in research and in clinical practice |
| eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
| format | article |
| id | ES_7cbbe5ddd9f353e5d3dbbe2012a5e6af |
| institution | Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| instname_str | Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| network_acronym_str | ES |
| network_name_str | España |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:recercat.cat:10230/35763 |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | Springer |
| publisherStr | Springer |
| reponame_str | Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| spelling | COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures Prinsen, Cecilia A.C. Mokkink, Lidwine B. Bouter, Lex M. Alonso Caballero, Jordi Patrick, Donald L. De Vet, Henrica C. W. Terwee, Caroline B. COSMIN Systematic review Measurement properties PROM Outcome measurement instrument Outcome measures Methodology Purpose: Systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) differ from reviews of interventions and diagnostic test accuracy studies and are complex. In fact, conducting a review of one or more PROMs comprises of multiple reviews (i.e., one review for each measurement property of each PROM). In the absence of guidance specifically designed for reviews on measurement properties, our aim was to develop a guideline for conducting systematic reviews of PROMs. Methods: Based on literature reviews and expert opinions, and in concordance with existing guidelines, the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) steering committee developed a guideline for systematic reviews of PROMs. Results: A consecutive ten-step procedure for conducting a systematic review of PROMs is proposed. Steps 1–4 concern preparing and performing the literature search, and selecting relevant studies. Steps 5–8 concern the evaluation of the quality of the eligible studies, the measurement properties, and the interpretability and feasibility aspects. Steps 9 and 10 concern formulating recommendations and reporting the systematic review. Conclusions: The COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of PROMs includes methodology to combine the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties with the quality of the PROM itself (i.e., its measurement properties). This enables reviewers to draw transparent conclusions and making evidence-based recommendations on the quality of PROMs, and supports the evidence-based selection of PROMs for use in research and in clinical practice CP has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme [FP7/2007-2013] under Grant Agreement No. 305081. Springer http://hdl.handle.net/10230/35763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3 |
| spellingShingle | COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures Prinsen, Cecilia A.C. COSMIN Systematic review Measurement properties PROM Outcome measurement instrument Outcome measures Methodology |
| status_str | publishedVersion |
| title | COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures |
| title_full | COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures |
| title_fullStr | COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures |
| title_full_unstemmed | COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures |
| title_short | COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures |
| title_sort | COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures |
| topic | COSMIN Systematic review Measurement properties PROM Outcome measurement instrument Outcome measures Methodology |
| topic_facet | COSMIN Systematic review Measurement properties PROM Outcome measurement instrument Outcome measures Methodology |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/10230/35763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3 |