COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study
Background: Scores on an outcome measurement instrument depend on the type and settings of the instrument used, how instructions are given to patients, how professionals administer and score the instrument, etc. The impact of all these sources of variation on scores can be assessed in studies on rel...
| Autores: | ; ; ; ; ; ; ; |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Artículo |
| Estado: | Published version |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2020 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Pompeu Fabra |
| Repositorio: | Repositorio Digital de la UPF |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/46149 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10230/46149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01179-5 |
| Nivel de acceso: | Acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | COSMIN Delphi study Measurement error Outcome measurement instruments Quality assessment Reliability Risk of Bias |
| _version_ | 1878735299991830528 |
|---|---|
| author | Mokkink, Lidwine B. |
| author2 | Boers, Maarten van der Vleuten, C.P.M. Bouter, Lex M. Alonso Caballero, Jordi Patrick, Donald L. De Vet, Henrica C. W. Terwee, Caroline B. |
| author2_role | author author author author author author author |
| author_browse | Alonso Caballero, Jordi Boers, Maarten Bouter, Lex M. De Vet, Henrica C. W. Mokkink, Lidwine B. Patrick, Donald L. Terwee, Caroline B. van der Vleuten, C.P.M. |
| author_facet | Mokkink, Lidwine B. Boers, Maarten van der Vleuten, C.P.M. Bouter, Lex M. Alonso Caballero, Jordi Patrick, Donald L. De Vet, Henrica C. W. Terwee, Caroline B. |
| author_role | author |
| collection | Repositorio Digital de la UPF |
| description | Background: Scores on an outcome measurement instrument depend on the type and settings of the instrument used, how instructions are given to patients, how professionals administer and score the instrument, etc. The impact of all these sources of variation on scores can be assessed in studies on reliability and measurement error, if properly designed and analyzed. The aim of this study was to develop standards to assess the quality of studies on reliability and measurement error of clinician-reported outcome measurement instruments, performance-based outcome measurement instrument, and laboratory values. Methods: We conducted a 3-round Delphi study involving 52 panelists. Results: Consensus was reached on how a comprehensive research question can be deduced from the design of a reliability study to determine how the results of a study inform us about the quality of the outcome measurement instrument at issue. Consensus was reached on components of outcome measurement instruments, i.e. the potential sources of variation. Next, we reached consensus on standards on design requirements (n = 5), standards on preferred statistical methods for reliability (n = 3) and measurement error (n = 2), and their ratings on a four-point scale. There was one term for a component and one rating of one standard on which no consensus was reached, and therefore required a decision by the steering committee. Conclusion: We developed a tool that enables researchers with and without thorough knowledge on measurement properties to assess the quality of a study on reliability and measurement error of outcome measurement instruments. |
| eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
| format | article |
| id | ES_7a04792209a5fc8cc51facd36b151ee5 |
| institution | Universitat Pompeu Fabra |
| instname_str | Universitat Pompeu Fabra |
| network_acronym_str | ES |
| network_name_str | España |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/46149 |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | BioMed Central |
| publisherStr | BioMed Central |
| reponame_str | Repositorio Digital de la UPF |
| spelling | COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study Mokkink, Lidwine B. Boers, Maarten van der Vleuten, C.P.M. Bouter, Lex M. Alonso Caballero, Jordi Patrick, Donald L. De Vet, Henrica C. W. Terwee, Caroline B. COSMIN Delphi study Measurement error Outcome measurement instruments Quality assessment Reliability Risk of Bias Background: Scores on an outcome measurement instrument depend on the type and settings of the instrument used, how instructions are given to patients, how professionals administer and score the instrument, etc. The impact of all these sources of variation on scores can be assessed in studies on reliability and measurement error, if properly designed and analyzed. The aim of this study was to develop standards to assess the quality of studies on reliability and measurement error of clinician-reported outcome measurement instruments, performance-based outcome measurement instrument, and laboratory values. Methods: We conducted a 3-round Delphi study involving 52 panelists. Results: Consensus was reached on how a comprehensive research question can be deduced from the design of a reliability study to determine how the results of a study inform us about the quality of the outcome measurement instrument at issue. Consensus was reached on components of outcome measurement instruments, i.e. the potential sources of variation. Next, we reached consensus on standards on design requirements (n = 5), standards on preferred statistical methods for reliability (n = 3) and measurement error (n = 2), and their ratings on a four-point scale. There was one term for a component and one rating of one standard on which no consensus was reached, and therefore required a decision by the steering committee. Conclusion: We developed a tool that enables researchers with and without thorough knowledge on measurement properties to assess the quality of a study on reliability and measurement error of outcome measurement instruments. BioMed Central http://hdl.handle.net/10230/46149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01179-5 |
| spellingShingle | COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study Mokkink, Lidwine B. COSMIN Delphi study Measurement error Outcome measurement instruments Quality assessment Reliability Risk of Bias |
| status_str | publishedVersion |
| title | COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study |
| title_full | COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study |
| title_fullStr | COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study |
| title_full_unstemmed | COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study |
| title_short | COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study |
| title_sort | COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study |
| topic | COSMIN Delphi study Measurement error Outcome measurement instruments Quality assessment Reliability Risk of Bias |
| topic_facet | COSMIN Delphi study Measurement error Outcome measurement instruments Quality assessment Reliability Risk of Bias |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/10230/46149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01179-5 |