Statistical techniques for estimating causal effects in biomedical research
Causal inference methods are statistical techniques used to analyse the causal effect of a treatment/exposure on an outcome. Their use is increasing in the last decade, especially in the framework of observational studies where the no randomization of the treatment/exposure may lead to confounding b...
| Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Doctoral thesis |
| Publication date: | 2022 |
| Country: | España |
| Institution: | Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM) |
| Repository: | Docta Complutense |
| Language: | English |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/3739 |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/3739 |
| Access Level: | Open access |
| Keyword: | 519.2:61(043.2) Medical statistics Estadística médica Estadística 1209 Estadística |
| Summary: | Causal inference methods are statistical techniques used to analyse the causal effect of a treatment/exposure on an outcome. Their use is increasing in the last decade, especially in the framework of observational studies where the no randomization of the treatment/exposure may lead to confounding bias. These methods present great advantages versus classic regression models due to their capability of reducing and controlling for confounding bias.This thesis begins with the use of known techniques applied in real clinical scenarios, second, a lack of developed statistical methods to estimate causal effects in complex epidemiological scenarios is noted. These findings support the main objective of this thesis, which is the development of causal inference methods to better understand and diagnose clinical and epidemiological outcomes. A comparison between the Propensity Score and classic regression models was made using an Intensive Care Unit database where it was shown that, in presence of confounding bias, Propensity Score performed better. Moreover, based on a systematic review and metaanalysis, causal estimates from Propensity Score and Randomized Controlled Trials were compared. It was observed that similar estimations were obtained in both approaches... |
|---|