Why not glycine electrochemical biosensors?

Glycine monitoring is gaining importance as a biomarker in clinical analysis due to its involvement in multiple physiological functions, which results in glycine being one of the most analyzed biomolecules for diagnostics. This growing demand requires faster and more reliable, while affordable, anal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Authors: Pérez Ràfols, Clara; Liu, Yujie; Wang, Qianyu; Cuartero, María; Crespo, Gastón A.
Format: Article
Status:Published version
Publication date:2020
Country:España
Institution:Universidad de Barcelona
Repository:Dipòsit Digital de la UB
OAI Identifier:oai:diposit.ub.edu:2445/173834
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/2445/173834
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Electroquímica
Biosensors
Assistència sanitària
Electrochemistry
Medical care
_version_ 1878729798353682432
author Pérez Ràfols, Clara
author2 Liu, Yujie
Wang, Qianyu
Cuartero, María
Crespo, Gastón A.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author_browse Crespo, Gastón A.
Cuartero, María
Liu, Yujie
Pérez Ràfols, Clara
Wang, Qianyu
author_facet Pérez Ràfols, Clara
Liu, Yujie
Wang, Qianyu
Cuartero, María
Crespo, Gastón A.
author_role author
collection Dipòsit Digital de la UB
description Glycine monitoring is gaining importance as a biomarker in clinical analysis due to its involvement in multiple physiological functions, which results in glycine being one of the most analyzed biomolecules for diagnostics. This growing demand requires faster and more reliable, while affordable, analytical methods that can replace the current gold standard for glycine detection, which is based on sample extraction with subsequent use of liquid chromatography or fluorometric kits for its quantification in centralized laboratories. This work discusses electrochemical sensors and biosensors as an alternative option, focusing on their potential application for glycine determination in blood, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid, the three most widely used matrices for glycine analysis with clinical meaning. For electrochemical sensors, voltammetry/amperometry is the preferred readout (10 of the 13 papers collected in this review) and metal-based redox mediator modification is the predominant approach for electrode fabrication (11 of the 13 papers). However, none of the reported electrochemical sensors fulfill the requirements for direct analysis of biological fluids, most of them lacking appropriate selectivity, linear range of response, and/or capability of measuring at physiological conditions. Enhanced selectivity has been recently reported using biosensors (with an enzyme element in the electrode design), although this is still a very incipient approach. Currently, despite the benefits of electrochemistry, only optical biosensors have been successfully reported for glycine detection and, from all the inspected works, it is clear that bioengineering efforts will play a key role in the embellishment of selectivity and storage stability of the sensing element in the sensor.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id ES_0f3f8b9fdff003fdf3bd16f3bd653d84
institution Universidad de Barcelona
instname_str Universidad de Barcelona
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
oai_identifier_str oai:diposit.ub.edu:2445/173834
publishDate 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher MDPI
publisherStr MDPI
reponame_str Dipòsit Digital de la UB
spelling Why not glycine electrochemical biosensors? Pérez Ràfols, Clara Liu, Yujie Wang, Qianyu Cuartero, María Crespo, Gastón A. Electroquímica Biosensors Assistència sanitària Electrochemistry Medical care Glycine monitoring is gaining importance as a biomarker in clinical analysis due to its involvement in multiple physiological functions, which results in glycine being one of the most analyzed biomolecules for diagnostics. This growing demand requires faster and more reliable, while affordable, analytical methods that can replace the current gold standard for glycine detection, which is based on sample extraction with subsequent use of liquid chromatography or fluorometric kits for its quantification in centralized laboratories. This work discusses electrochemical sensors and biosensors as an alternative option, focusing on their potential application for glycine determination in blood, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid, the three most widely used matrices for glycine analysis with clinical meaning. For electrochemical sensors, voltammetry/amperometry is the preferred readout (10 of the 13 papers collected in this review) and metal-based redox mediator modification is the predominant approach for electrode fabrication (11 of the 13 papers). However, none of the reported electrochemical sensors fulfill the requirements for direct analysis of biological fluids, most of them lacking appropriate selectivity, linear range of response, and/or capability of measuring at physiological conditions. Enhanced selectivity has been recently reported using biosensors (with an enzyme element in the electrode design), although this is still a very incipient approach. Currently, despite the benefits of electrochemistry, only optical biosensors have been successfully reported for glycine detection and, from all the inspected works, it is clear that bioengineering efforts will play a key role in the embellishment of selectivity and storage stability of the sensing element in the sensor. MDPI https://hdl.handle.net/2445/173834
spellingShingle Why not glycine electrochemical biosensors?
Pérez Ràfols, Clara
Electroquímica
Biosensors
Assistència sanitària
Electrochemistry
Medical care
status_str publishedVersion
title Why not glycine electrochemical biosensors?
title_full Why not glycine electrochemical biosensors?
title_fullStr Why not glycine electrochemical biosensors?
title_full_unstemmed Why not glycine electrochemical biosensors?
title_short Why not glycine electrochemical biosensors?
title_sort Why not glycine electrochemical biosensors?
topic Electroquímica
Biosensors
Assistència sanitària
Electrochemistry
Medical care
topic_facet Electroquímica
Biosensors
Assistència sanitària
Electrochemistry
Medical care
url https://hdl.handle.net/2445/173834