Acute Effect of Upper-Lower Body Super-Set Vs. Traditional-Set Configurations on Bar Execution Velocity and Volume

This study aimed to compare the effect on bar execution velocity and number of repetitions between two velocity-based resistance training protocols only differing in the set configuration of the full-squat (SQ) and bench-press (BP) exercises. Moderately strength-trained men were assigned to a tradit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Peña García-Orea, Guillermo; Rodríguez Rosell, David; Segarra Carrillo, Daniel; Edir Da Silva-Grigoletto, Marzo; Belando Pedreño, Noelia
Tipo de documento: Artículo
Fecha de publicación:2022
País:España
Institución:Universidad Pablo de Olavide (UPO)
Repositorio:RIO. Repositorio Institucional Olavide
Lenguaje:Inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:rio.upo.es:10433/25081
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10433/25081
Nivel de acceso:Acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Set configuration
Neuromuscular performance
Velocity-based training
Resistance training
_version_ 1878729634233712640
author Peña García-Orea, Guillermo
author2 Rodríguez Rosell, David
Segarra Carrillo, Daniel
Edir Da Silva-Grigoletto, Marzo
Belando Pedreño, Noelia
author2_role author
author
author
author
author_browse Belando Pedreño, Noelia
Edir Da Silva-Grigoletto, Marzo
Peña García-Orea, Guillermo
Rodríguez Rosell, David
Segarra Carrillo, Daniel
author_facet Peña García-Orea, Guillermo
Rodríguez Rosell, David
Segarra Carrillo, Daniel
Edir Da Silva-Grigoletto, Marzo
Belando Pedreño, Noelia
author_role author
collection RIO. Repositorio Institucional Olavide
description This study aimed to compare the effect on bar execution velocity and number of repetitions between two velocity-based resistance training protocols only differing in the set configuration of the full-squat (SQ) and bench-press (BP) exercises. Moderately strength-trained men were assigned to a traditional (TS, n = 9)- or an alternating-set (AS, n = 10) configuration group to perform four testing sessions against different relative loads (55–60–65–70% 1RM). Relative load, magnitude of intra-set velocity loss (%VL), number of sets, inter-set recovery time, and exercise order were matched for both groups in each session. Mean propulsive velocity of the first repetition (MPVfirst), average number of repetitions per set (NRS), total number of repetitions (TNR), and total training time per session (TT) were measured. No significant differences between training conditions were observed for any relative load in MPVfirst, NRS, and TNR in both exercises. The TS group completed a significantly higher number of repetitions (p < 0.05) at faster velocities (MPV > 0.9–1.1 m·s−1) in the SQ. In conclusion, training sessions performing AS between SQ and BP exercises with moderate relative loads and %VL result in similar bar execution velocity and volume, but in a more time-efficient manner, than the traditional approach.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id ES_0bdd9a606f04c8da2d0cf67e65433db3
institution Universidad Pablo de Olavide (UPO)
instname_str Universidad Pablo de Olavide (UPO)
language eng
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
oai_identifier_str oai:rio.upo.es:10433/25081
publishDate 2022
publishDateSort 2022
publisher MDPI
publisherStr MDPI
reponame_str RIO. Repositorio Institucional Olavide
spelling Acute Effect of Upper-Lower Body Super-Set Vs. Traditional-Set Configurations on Bar Execution Velocity and Volume Peña García-Orea, Guillermo Rodríguez Rosell, David Segarra Carrillo, Daniel Edir Da Silva-Grigoletto, Marzo Belando Pedreño, Noelia Set configuration Neuromuscular performance Velocity-based training Resistance training This study aimed to compare the effect on bar execution velocity and number of repetitions between two velocity-based resistance training protocols only differing in the set configuration of the full-squat (SQ) and bench-press (BP) exercises. Moderately strength-trained men were assigned to a traditional (TS, n = 9)- or an alternating-set (AS, n = 10) configuration group to perform four testing sessions against different relative loads (55–60–65–70% 1RM). Relative load, magnitude of intra-set velocity loss (%VL), number of sets, inter-set recovery time, and exercise order were matched for both groups in each session. Mean propulsive velocity of the first repetition (MPVfirst), average number of repetitions per set (NRS), total number of repetitions (TNR), and total training time per session (TT) were measured. No significant differences between training conditions were observed for any relative load in MPVfirst, NRS, and TNR in both exercises. The TS group completed a significantly higher number of repetitions (p < 0.05) at faster velocities (MPV > 0.9–1.1 m·s−1) in the SQ. In conclusion, training sessions performing AS between SQ and BP exercises with moderate relative loads and %VL result in similar bar execution velocity and volume, but in a more time-efficient manner, than the traditional approach. MDPI https://hdl.handle.net/10433/25081
spellingShingle Acute Effect of Upper-Lower Body Super-Set Vs. Traditional-Set Configurations on Bar Execution Velocity and Volume
Peña García-Orea, Guillermo
Set configuration
Neuromuscular performance
Velocity-based training
Resistance training
title Acute Effect of Upper-Lower Body Super-Set Vs. Traditional-Set Configurations on Bar Execution Velocity and Volume
title_full Acute Effect of Upper-Lower Body Super-Set Vs. Traditional-Set Configurations on Bar Execution Velocity and Volume
title_fullStr Acute Effect of Upper-Lower Body Super-Set Vs. Traditional-Set Configurations on Bar Execution Velocity and Volume
title_full_unstemmed Acute Effect of Upper-Lower Body Super-Set Vs. Traditional-Set Configurations on Bar Execution Velocity and Volume
title_short Acute Effect of Upper-Lower Body Super-Set Vs. Traditional-Set Configurations on Bar Execution Velocity and Volume
title_sort Acute Effect of Upper-Lower Body Super-Set Vs. Traditional-Set Configurations on Bar Execution Velocity and Volume
topic Set configuration
Neuromuscular performance
Velocity-based training
Resistance training
topic_facet Set configuration
Neuromuscular performance
Velocity-based training
Resistance training
url https://hdl.handle.net/10433/25081