Presumption of innocence in comparative legislation and Brazilian jurisprudence

This article studies the presumption of innocence in comparative legislation, in international treaties and in Brazilian law. It addresses the procedural effects of the rule inscribed in article 5, item LVII, of the Federal Constitution, under tripartite bias, which is the rule of treatment, evident...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Author: Moreira, Leandro Lara
Format: Article
Status:Published version
Publication date:2022
Country:Brasil
Institution:PROCESSUS
Repository:Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros (Online)
Language:Portuguese
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs2.periodicos.processus.com.br:article/1226
Online Access:https://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/article/view/1226
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Criminal procedure
Presumption of innocence
Restriction to treatment rule
Processual Penal
Presunção de inocência
Restrição à regra de tratamento
_version_ 1878750403279978496
author Moreira, Leandro Lara
author_browse Moreira, Leandro Lara
author_facet Moreira, Leandro Lara
author_role author
collection Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros (Online)
description This article studies the presumption of innocence in comparative legislation, in international treaties and in Brazilian law. It addresses the procedural effects of the rule inscribed in article 5, item LVII, of the Federal Constitution, under tripartite bias, which is the rule of treatment, evidentiary rule and rule of law. It will be demonstrated that the relativization of the presumption of innocence is reasonable, proportional and constitutional, based on the legitimacy of constitutional jurisdiction, within the limits delineated by the legal and jurisprudential balances established in international laws and treaties. It will be demonstrated that mitigation of the right to liberty does not offend the essential core of the presumption of innocence.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id BR_0e17b073a2f6b1663244f9df2dfb5c2c
institution PROCESSUS
instname_str Faculdade Processus (DF)
language por
network_acronym_str BR
network_name_str Brasil
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.periodicos.processus.com.br:article/1226
publishDate 2022
publishDateSort 2022
publisher Centro Universitário Processus - UniProcessus
publisherStr Centro Universitário Processus - UniProcessus
reponame_str Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros (Online)
spelling Presumption of innocence in comparative legislation and Brazilian jurisprudence Presunção de inocência na legislação comparada e na jurisprudência brasileira Moreira, Leandro Lara Criminal procedure Presumption of innocence Restriction to treatment rule Processual Penal Presunção de inocência Restrição à regra de tratamento This article studies the presumption of innocence in comparative legislation, in international treaties and in Brazilian law. It addresses the procedural effects of the rule inscribed in article 5, item LVII, of the Federal Constitution, under tripartite bias, which is the rule of treatment, evidentiary rule and rule of law. It will be demonstrated that the relativization of the presumption of innocence is reasonable, proportional and constitutional, based on the legitimacy of constitutional jurisdiction, within the limits delineated by the legal and jurisprudential balances established in international laws and treaties. It will be demonstrated that mitigation of the right to liberty does not offend the essential core of the presumption of innocence. O objetivo desse artigo, constituindo-se de uma pesquisa do tipo qualitativa, com métodos hipotético-dialético e dedutivo, utilizando a técnica de pesquisa doutrinária, legislativa e jurisprudencial, é debater a presunção de inocência na legislação comparada, nos tratados internacionais e no direito brasileiro.  Aborda os efeitos processuais da norma insculpida no artigo 5º, inciso LVII, da Constituição Federal, sob viés tripartido, qual seja regra de tratamento, regra probatória e regra de juízo. Demonstrar-se-á que a relativização da presunção de inocência é razoável, proporcional e constitucional, fundada na legitimidade da jurisdição constitucional, nos limites delineados pelas balizas legais e jurisprudenciais constantes das leis e tratados internacionais. Demonstrar-se-á que a mitigação do direito à liberdade não ofende o núcleo essencial do princípio da presunção de inocência. Centro Universitário Processus - UniProcessus https://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/article/view/1226
spellingShingle Presumption of innocence in comparative legislation and Brazilian jurisprudence
Moreira, Leandro Lara
Criminal procedure
Presumption of innocence
Restriction to treatment rule
Processual Penal
Presunção de inocência
Restrição à regra de tratamento
status_str publishedVersion
title Presumption of innocence in comparative legislation and Brazilian jurisprudence
title_full Presumption of innocence in comparative legislation and Brazilian jurisprudence
title_fullStr Presumption of innocence in comparative legislation and Brazilian jurisprudence
title_full_unstemmed Presumption of innocence in comparative legislation and Brazilian jurisprudence
title_short Presumption of innocence in comparative legislation and Brazilian jurisprudence
title_sort Presumption of innocence in comparative legislation and Brazilian jurisprudence
topic Criminal procedure
Presumption of innocence
Restriction to treatment rule
Processual Penal
Presunção de inocência
Restrição à regra de tratamento
topic_facet Criminal procedure
Presumption of innocence
Restriction to treatment rule
Processual Penal
Presunção de inocência
Restrição à regra de tratamento
url https://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/article/view/1226