The high five: Associations of the five positive factors with the big five and well-being
The study of individual differences in positive characteristics has mainly focused on moral traits. The objectives of this research were to study individual differences in positive characteristics from the point of view of the layperson, including non-moral individual characteristics, and to generat...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Status: | Published version |
| Publication date: | 2017 |
| Country: | Argentina |
| Institution: | Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| Repository: | CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| Language: | English |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/40934 |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/11336/40934 |
| Access Level: | Open access |
| Keyword: | FACTOR ANALYSIS FIVE FACTOR PERSONALITY MODEL INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES TEST VALIDITY WELL-BEING https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
| Summary: | The study of individual differences in positive characteristics has mainly focused on moral traits. The objectives of this research were to study individual differences in positive characteristics from the point of view of the layperson, including non-moral individual characteristics, and to generate a replicable model of positive factors. Three studies based on a lexical approach were conducted. The first study generated a corpus of words which resulted in a refined list of socially shared positive characteristics. The second study produced a five-factor model of positive characteristics: erudition, peace, cheerfulness, honesty, and tenacity. The third study confirmed the model with a different sample. The five-positive-factor model not only showed positive associations with emotional, psychological and social well-being, but it also accounted for the variance beyond that accounted for by the Big Five factors in predicting these well-being dimensions. In addition, the presence of convergent and divergent validity of the five positive factors is shown with relation to the Values-in-Action (VIA) classification of character strengths proposed by Peterson and Seligman (2004). |
|---|