The «procedural autonomy» and the Constitutional Court: notes on an invented relationship

The author deals with the background of what is known as the institute of «procedural autonomy»; to this end he employs the study made by the Spanish author Patricia Rodríguez-Mendoza and concludes that the study does not, in fact, deal with «procedural autonomy» (proceeding) but rather «procedural...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor: Monroy Gálvez, Juan
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Estado:Published version
Data de publicação:2007
País:Perú
Recursos:PJ
Repositório:Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú
Idioma:Espanhol
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/102
Acesso em linha:https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/102
Nível de acesso:Acesso aberto
Palavra-chave:procedural autonomy
Constitutional Court
procedural
autonomía procesal
Tribunal Constitucional
proceso
procedimiento
Descrição
Resumo:The author deals with the background of what is known as the institute of «procedural autonomy»; to this end he employs the study made by the Spanish author Patricia Rodríguez-Mendoza and concludes that the study does not, in fact, deal with «procedural autonomy» (proceeding) but rather «procedural autonomy». Finally, the author concludes that with his article he looks to reveal that the use of the Constitutional Procedural Autonomy has been the foundation for the harmful effects caused in various verdict of the Constitutional Court.