The Problem of Eros in Our Lives
The ideal of platonic love was demystified by Jacques Lacan at the beginning of his teaching years. Lacan tried to distinguish a demand for love which is directed toward the other from a desire which looks only for its satisfaction. It is not until Laca give the seminar Transference (1960–1961) that...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Artículo |
| Estado: | Published version |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2015 |
| País: | México |
| Institución: | ITESM |
| Repositorio: | En-claves del pensamiento |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.enclavesdelpensamiento.mx:article/41 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.enclavesdelpensamiento.mx/index.php/enclaves/article/view/41 |
| Nivel de acceso: | Acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Eros deseo amor objeto parcial amante amado desire love partial object lover being loved |
| Sumario: | The ideal of platonic love was demystified by Jacques Lacan at the beginning of his teaching years. Lacan tried to distinguish a demand for love which is directed toward the other from a desire which looks only for its satisfaction. It is not until Laca give the seminar Transference (1960–1961) that he finds in The Banquet a scandalous scene between Socrates and Alcibiades which allows a place for Eros as emergent from a place, that of deisre. This allows Lacan to distance his idea of love from the Hegelian logic which supposes that desire has at its essence the destruction of its object. |
|---|