On the controllability of networks with nonidentical linear nodes

"The controllability of dynamical networks depends on both network structure and node dynamics. For networks of linearly coupled linear dynamical systems the controllability of the network can be determined using the well-known Kalman rank criterion. In the case of identical nodes the problem can be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Authors: Alejandra del Carmen Arreola Delgado; JUAN GONZALO BARAJAS RAMIREZ
Format: Article
Status:Submitted version
Publication date:2016
Country:México
Institution:IPICYT
Repository:Repositorio Institucional del IPICYT
OAI Identifier:oai:ipicyt.repositorioinstitucional.mx:1010/1735
Online Access:http://ipicyt.repositorioinstitucional.mx/jspui/handle/1010/1735
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:info:eu-repo/classification/Autor/Network control
info:eu-repo/classification/Autor/Controllability
info:eu-repo/classification/Autor/Linear system
info:eu-repo/classification/cti/1
info:eu-repo/classification/cti/12
Description
Summary:"The controllability of dynamical networks depends on both network structure and node dynamics. For networks of linearly coupled linear dynamical systems the controllability of the network can be determined using the well-known Kalman rank criterion. In the case of identical nodes the problem can be decomposed in local and structural contributions. However, for strictly different nodes an alternative approach is needed. We decomposed the controllability matrix into a structural component, which only depends on the networks structure and a dynamical component which includes the dynamical description of the nodes in the network. Using this approach we show that controllability of dynamical networks with strictly different linear nodes is dominated by the dynamical component. Therefore even a structurally uncontrollable network of different nn dimensional nodes becomes controllable if the dynamics of its nodes are properly chosen. Conversely, a structurally controllable network becomes uncontrollable for a given choice of the node’s dynamics. Furthermore, as nodes are not identical, we can have nodes that are uncontrollable in isolation, while the entire network is controllable, in this sense the node’s controllability is overwritten by the network even if the structure is uncontrollable. We illustrate our results using single-controller networks and extend our findings to conventional networks with large number of nodes."