Backing and undercutting in abstract argumentation frameworks
This work will introduce a novel combination of two important argumentation related notions. We will start from the well-known basis of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks or AFs, and we will build a new formalism in which the notions corresponding to Toulmin's backings and Pollock's undercutting defe...
| Authors: | ; ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Status: | Published version |
| Publication date: | 2012 |
| Country: | Argentina |
| Institution: | Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| Repository: | CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| Language: | English |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/66263 |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/11336/66263 |
| Access Level: | Open access |
| Keyword: | Argumentation Defeasible Reasoning https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.2 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
| _version_ | 1878403758721859584 |
|---|---|
| author | Cohen, Andrea |
| author2 | García, Alejandro Javier Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
| author2_role | author author |
| author_browse | Cohen, Andrea García, Alejandro Javier Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
| author_facet | Cohen, Andrea García, Alejandro Javier Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
| author_role | author |
| collection | CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| description | This work will introduce a novel combination of two important argumentation related notions. We will start from the well-known basis of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks or AFs, and we will build a new formalism in which the notions corresponding to Toulmin's backings and Pollock's undercutting defeaters are considered. The resulting system, Backing-Undercutting Argumentation Frameworks or BUAFs, will be an extension of the AFs that includes a specialized support relation, a distinction between different attack types, and a preference relation among arguments. Thus, BUAFs will provide a richer representation tool for handling scenarios where information can be attacked and supported. © 2012 Springer-Verlag. |
| eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
| format | article |
| id | AR_baee8c4d71289f8c7ab3a7a67cb064f8 |
| identifier_str_mv | Cohen, Andrea; García, Alejandro Javier; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo; Backing and undercutting in abstract argumentation frameworks; Springer; Lecture Notes in Computer Science; 7153; 3-2012; 107-123 0302-9743 978-3-642-28472-4 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| institution | Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| instname_str | Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| language | eng |
| network_acronym_str | AR |
| network_name_str | Argentina |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/66263 |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publishDateSort | 2012 |
| publisher | Springer |
| publisherStr | Springer |
| reponame_str | CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| spelling | Backing and undercutting in abstract argumentation frameworks Cohen, Andrea García, Alejandro Javier Simari, Guillermo Ricardo Argumentation Defeasible Reasoning https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.2 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 This work will introduce a novel combination of two important argumentation related notions. We will start from the well-known basis of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks or AFs, and we will build a new formalism in which the notions corresponding to Toulmin's backings and Pollock's undercutting defeaters are considered. The resulting system, Backing-Undercutting Argumentation Frameworks or BUAFs, will be an extension of the AFs that includes a specialized support relation, a distinction between different attack types, and a preference relation among arguments. Thus, BUAFs will provide a richer representation tool for handling scenarios where information can be attacked and supported. © 2012 Springer-Verlag. Fil: Cohen, Andrea. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación; Argentina Fil: García, Alejandro Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación; Argentina Fil: Simari, Guillermo Ricardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur; Argentina Springer http://hdl.handle.net/11336/66263 Cohen, Andrea; García, Alejandro Javier; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo; Backing and undercutting in abstract argumentation frameworks; Springer; Lecture Notes in Computer Science; 7153; 3-2012; 107-123 0302-9743 978-3-642-28472-4 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| spellingShingle | Backing and undercutting in abstract argumentation frameworks Cohen, Andrea Argumentation Defeasible Reasoning https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.2 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
| status_str | publishedVersion |
| title | Backing and undercutting in abstract argumentation frameworks |
| title_full | Backing and undercutting in abstract argumentation frameworks |
| title_fullStr | Backing and undercutting in abstract argumentation frameworks |
| title_full_unstemmed | Backing and undercutting in abstract argumentation frameworks |
| title_short | Backing and undercutting in abstract argumentation frameworks |
| title_sort | Backing and undercutting in abstract argumentation frameworks |
| topic | Argumentation Defeasible Reasoning https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.2 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
| topic_facet | Argumentation Defeasible Reasoning https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.2 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/11336/66263 |